Criticisms of Sharepoint 2007

Posted on 9/16/2007 @ 12:43 PM in #SharePoint by | Feedback | 6901 views

Okay, yes I have written a gazooka of articles on Sharepoint 2007 singing eulogies about how cool the product is.

... but ...

I have my own set of annoyances that I am going to document here as I run into them. This blogpost will remain online and constantly updated as I run into more and more of these annoyances. I am hoping the MSFT folks & community (which includes me) will either address them in a tool, or decent explanations or the next version.

But the first step in fixing a problem is recognizing the problem, So here goes.

1. Why did MSFT have to embed the Windows.Sharepoint.dll file in an orifice of windows that nobody would ever bother to look in? Seriously, it is at (ready?) - C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\12\ISAPI\. Do note that this is not an ISAPI file - it is a .NET assembly, and yes there is a "BIN" at the same level as "ISAPI". But all the sharepoint .NET assemblies are under the ISAPI folder :-/. Why not a more logical location like C:\Program Files\Sharepoint 2007, OR, the GAC.

2. The XMLITIS sharepoint has. Oh my god!! Whatever was wrong with MSI files that sharepoint had to resolve to fiddly batch files, twidly command line utilities, hacky XML files, and hard-coded GUIDs and IDs all over the place to get the basic things done in Sharepoint? Did you know how you find a content type id in sharepoint? By going to the page that has the content type id administration, and copy pasting a part of the query string !! #@!$&%^ WTF.

Update: Untrue. Twiddly batch files is not the recommended approach for production deployment, you should use WSPs.

3. The "Lets restart IIS because someone in istanbul farted disease". Seriously, change the web.config to deploy a new webpart? And the have to run iisreset for pretty much everything you do? How do you get away with that on a production environment? Oh .. load balancing huh? Except not every machine and operation is 100% stateless. :-/

4. The "For the love of GAC, stop putting things in GAC". I thought GAC was a bad idea for every darned assembly. This is why we got away from putting stuff in C:\Windows\System32, because you want applications to be self contained and no versioning conflicts etc. But every darned thing you do, you are almost goaded to think "GAC". Hmmm ...

Update: Untrue, there are places other than GAC where you can put your assemblies.

5. The too good to be true promises. People, I want to break a heartbreaking news - MSFT marketing is full of poo. A very very small part of Sharepoint 2007 meets the legal accessibility requirements. To be specific, only the anonymous view meets 508 specs. But then ASP.NET itself does a very poor job on accessibility. (And for all those guys who will come disagree - please read what I said earlier "MSFT marketing is full of poo").

Update: HiSoftware is working on SAK - SharePoint accessibility Kit. Also, SharePoint is now DOD5015.2 compliant.

6. Master page customization. Oh wait - but that was a good thing. Yes it indeed is a good thing, except for all practical purposes, it doesn't work :-/. Why? Well first of all, customizability in Sharepoint 2003 was a FUCKING JOKE. In 2007, customizability through sharepoint designer is much improved, except it affects only half the pages. Yup - you read that right. Anything to do with Appmaster.master and the layouts directory is left untouched. Which means, half your site still looks sharepointy. Should you choose to modify appmaster.master - every darned site on that machine, including SCAW tries to adopt that look.

Update: I posted a workaround to this rather silly problem here.

Sound off but keep it civil:

Older comments..


On 10/29/2006 9:20:07 PM askar said ..
Sahil -

It looks like your RSS feed is kind of broken or something. I have you in my Google Reader and the latest entry that I can see is your "Writing custom editors for web parts" entry. Just thought of letting you know.


- Askar


On 10/29/2006 10:36:59 PM Sahil Malik said ..
Askar -

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I double checked with Google reader, everything seems to work at my end :-/.

Hmm .. can u try some other RSS reader for just a trial shot? If there is indeed something wrong, I'd rather fix it.

SM


On 10/30/2006 10:17:48 AM Steve said ..
As far as number 6 - That is extremely disapointed, another false marketing from MS. This was the worse part of 2003, and to know they only took it half way in 2007 means I hope I don't get stuck working with SP until they fix this.


On 10/30/2006 11:25:38 AM Sahil Malik said ..
Steve -

Did you see the workaround I posted?

SM


On 10/31/2006 9:22:57 PM Vishwas Lele said ..
Sahil,

re:4, you could put stuff in the bin and set the trust settings appropriately.


On 11/1/2006 8:32:52 AM Sahil Malik said ..
Vishwas - Yes you can. But GAC is so much more convenient. Also, for certain things you must put stuff in GAC.


On 1/11/2007 3:29:04 AM Jane Brassington said ..
I would just like to say thanks - you saved my sanity! Its not me its Sharepoint that is crazy!


On 1/11/2007 6:32:33 AM Sahil Malik said ..
YW, Jane. :)


On 11/11/2007 9:17:02 PM Graham Plowman said ..
Interesting to read the comments on this page.


We have been working with MOSS 2007 for serveral months now and to be perfectly honest, if MS is serious about this product, they need to make it SERIOUSLY easier to customise. It is FAR TOO UNNECESSARILY COMPLICATED. Everyone I have acquainted with regarding the product has said the same thing and virtually all of them have disgarded the product due to its difficulty of customisation.


One wonders when businesses will get over that old chestnut of buy vs develop and realise that for those of us who have the skills, developing a custom web site is significantly quicker and easier than to waste inordinate amounts of time trying to shoe-horn business into an inflexible product. Custom development in this instance is significantly more cost effective!


I don't rate Sharepoint as a worthy tool. It has some nice features, it is easy for users and it is easy to administer...just don't think about customising it!!

Graham Plowman


On 10/23/2008 4:07:31 PM marvin said ..
Sharepoint is d lamest thing i ever saw, difficult to use, expensive and ugly.


On 7/31/2009 2:58:34 PM Alex Denissov said ..
I was an absolute newbie in SharePoint. My first task was to provide reports in SharePoint for data provided in a REPEATING TABLE of an InfoPath form. I had no damn idea that that seemingly routine task has no built-in solution and custom code has to be written. How could I've known that???? What are the supposed channels of communicating that to me? How many other hidden roadblocks are there? I recommended my bosses to not use SharePoint and to write a custom application instead.